Maddy v. General Electric Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior District Judge:
Plaintiffs bring this putative collective action pursuant to § 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) to recover allegedly unpaid overtime compensation from Defendant General Electric Company (“Defendant” or “GE”). '
Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for conditional collective action certification. For the reasons explained herein, Plaintiffs’ motion is-GRANTED.
*677I. FACTS
The Court recites those facts relevant to deciding Plaintiffs pending motion for conditional certification.
Scope of Employment
Plaintiffs in this case are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Victor Zavala v. Wal Mart Stores IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Symczyk v. Genesis HealthCare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Camesi v. University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Pearsall-Dineen v. Freedom Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Conde v. Open Door Marketing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Camara v. Mastro's Rests. LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- ARRIAGA v. ANTHONY LOGISTICS OF HUDSON COUNTY LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- Alan Schelhas, individually and for others similarly situated v. Hackensack Meridian Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- CLARK v. INTELENET AMERICA, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.