Legal Opinion

Maddy v. General Electric Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 14, 2014No. Civil Action No. 14-0490 (JEI/KMW)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRENAS, Senior District Judge:

Plaintiffs bring this putative collective action pursuant to § 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) to recover allegedly unpaid overtime compensation from Defendant General Electric Company (“Defendant” or “GE”). '

Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for conditional collective action certification. For the reasons explained herein, Plaintiffs’ motion is-GRANTED.

*677I. FACTS

The Court recites those facts relevant to deciding Plaintiffs pending motion for conditional certification.

Scope of Employment

Plaintiffs in this case are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Victor Zavala v. Wal Mart Stores IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. Symczyk v. Genesis HealthCare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. Camesi v. University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  5. Pearsall-Dineen v. Freedom Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Conde v. Open Door Marketing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  2. Camara v. Mastro's Rests. LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. ARRIAGA v. ANTHONY LOGISTICS OF HUDSON COUNTY LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
  4. Alan Schelhas, individually and for others similarly situated v. Hackensack Meridian Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
  5. CLARK v. INTELENET AMERICA, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API