Legal Opinion

United States v. George Pearson, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 13, 2005No. 04-13411; D.C. Docket 03-00343-CR-T-30-MSSUnpublished

1Per curiam

George Pearson, Jr., appeals his convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute “crack” cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(b)(l)(A)(iii), possession with intent to distribute “crack” cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and (c), and argues that the district judge abused his discretion by not allowing Pearson to withdraw his guilty plea because it was not knowing and intelligent. We AFFIRM.

I. BACKGROUND

A federal grand jury indicted Pearson for (1) conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams of “crack” cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Robert Clay Medlock, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Larry Jarome RogersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Orlando Jairo Gonzalez-MercadoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Dolores FreixasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. McCartyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API