Legal Opinion

Moravecz v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1958No. Appeal, No. 20PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Jones,

This action in assumpsit was instituted by the plaintiffs as the owners of certain surface land to recover damages for the alleged breach of a covenant by the defendant lessee of underlying coal to “drill a Avell and install a pump to furnish a sufficient supply of good water” to buildings of the surface owner in the event that the existing supply of Avater Avas damaged by mining operations of the lessee of the coal. At trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs for $6,250 whereon the court below entered judgment after overruling the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bald Eagle Valley Railroad v. Nittany Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Borg v. DowningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Ward v. VanceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  4. Householder v. Quemahoning Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Giuliano v. Local Union No. 830, Internat'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1964
  2. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals v. Borough of West Chester and Pfizer Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API