Legal Opinion

Morten v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 4, 2019No. 0215/17Published

1Opinion of the Court

Morten v. State, No. 215 of the 2017 Term, Opinion by Moylan J. UNEXCEPTIONABLE FACTUAL BACKGROUND – HEARSAY TO THE RESCUE, OSTENSIBLY – INITIAL FOCUS – “MY GOD, IT’S A COBRA!” – PRESENT SENSE IMPRESSION – AN ALTERNATIVE HOLDING: THE TRUEALLELE MODALITY OF DNA IDENTIFICATION – THE PRECISE TARGET IN THE CROSSHAIRS: TRUEALLELE SPECIFICALLY, NOT DNA GENERALLY – ADMISSIBILITY VERSUS WEIGHT – “A ROSE BY ANY OTHER NAME . . . ” – THE PRETRIAL HEARING ON ADMISSIBILITY – THE PRESUMPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE HEARING – QUALIFYING AND DISQUALIFYING AN EXPERT WITNESS – A HAMSTRUNG DEFENSE – THEORETICAL…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Nance v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API