Morten v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Morten v. State, No. 215 of the 2017 Term, Opinion by Moylan J. UNEXCEPTIONABLE FACTUAL BACKGROUND – HEARSAY TO THE RESCUE, OSTENSIBLY – INITIAL FOCUS – “MY GOD, IT’S A COBRA!” – PRESENT SENSE IMPRESSION – AN ALTERNATIVE HOLDING: THE TRUEALLELE MODALITY OF DNA IDENTIFICATION – THE PRECISE TARGET IN THE CROSSHAIRS: TRUEALLELE SPECIFICALLY, NOT DNA GENERALLY – ADMISSIBILITY VERSUS WEIGHT – “A ROSE BY ANY OTHER NAME . . . ” – THE PRETRIAL HEARING ON ADMISSIBILITY – THE PRESUMPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE HEARING – QUALIFYING AND DISQUALIFYING AN EXPERT WITNESS – A HAMSTRUNG DEFENSE – THEORETICAL…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Nance v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.