Legal Opinion

Corcoran v. Harris

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 14, 1928No. Docket No. 6467PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

This is an original application for prohibition seeking to restrain the respondent, as Judge of the Superior Court in Alameda County, from proceeding further under an order of examination issued by him under a judgment rendered in Los Angeles County. The theory of petitioner is that the superior court of the county where the judgment has been rendered and where execution has been returned unsatisfied has sole jurisdiction to direct the judgment debtor to appear and be examined.

The proceedings were instituted under section 714 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which reads: “When an execution…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCullough v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Watson v. PryorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. People v. McKamyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coleman v. GalvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Southern California Telephone Co. v. DamensteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. de Jesús Torres v. Caribbean Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
  4. de Jesús Torres v. Caribbean Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API