Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. Hart

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 2005No. S-05-376PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

NATURE OF CASE

On March 23, 2005, formal charges were filed by the State of Nebraska on behalf of the Counsel for Discipline of the Nebraska Supreme Court, as relator, against the respondent, James C. Hart, Jr., who was admitted to the practice of law in the State of Nebraska on February 28, 1972. After Hart failed to file an answer to the formal charges in the present case, we sustained the relator’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and must now determine the appropriate sanction.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The formal charges state that Hart practices law in Omaha, Nebraska. After…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. SuttonNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline of the Nebraska Supreme Court v. HartNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. GilroyNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline v. SwansonNebraska Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. WickenkampNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. HoganNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline of the Nebraska Supreme Court v. ReillyNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State Ex Rel. Counsel for Dis. v. SamuelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API