Legal Opinion

Le Tastevin, Inc. v. Seattle First National Bank

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 19, 1999No. 42163-8-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

— A redemptioner may not toll the statutory redemption period without tendering the sum required to redeem.1 Likewise, a judgment debtor may not suspend a levy and execution without tendering the amount required to satisfy the judgment that underlies the writ of execution. Because the judgment debtor here failed to tender the amount due to satisfy the judgment, the sheriff was entitled to proceed with the levy and execution sale. We affirm the summary judgment order of dismissal.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. Seattle First National Bank (Seafirst) obtained a judgment against Le…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hutchins v. 1001 Fourth Avenue AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Mains Farm Homeowners Ass'n v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Timberland Bank v. Shawn Mesaros & Jane Doe Mesaros State Of Wa DshsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API