Wade A. Kilpatrick, Stan E. Golub v. John C. Riddle, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., as Receiver for First Republicbank Houston, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the following question: Does the D’Oench, Duhme doctrine,1 which protects the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation from the effect of unrecorded agreements between an insured bank and its customers, preclude borrowers who were defrauded by failed banks, from bringing an action under federal securities laws against the FDIC as receiver? Although several circuits have touched on this question, none have squarely considered it. Supreme Court precedent, however, now makes clear that debtors may not raise bank fraud as a defense to the FDIC’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Huddleston v. Herman & MacLeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,654 William L. Gunter and Camille S. Gunter v. Theodore M. HutchesonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Harold v. Beighley v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Timberland Design, Inc. And William C. Barnsley v. First Service Bank for SavingsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Jackson v. ThweattTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. GiammetteiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Julio S. LaguartaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Castleglen, Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.