Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Awtry Lowndes Company

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1948No. 16283PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Chief Justice.

1. “To entitle one to the writ of mandamus it must appear that he has a clear legal right to have performed the particular act which he seeks to have enforced.” City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort, 153 Ga. 499 (5) (113 S. E. 545); Speed Oil Co. v. Aldredge, 192 Ga. 285 (15 S. E. 2d, 214). “Before mandamus will issue, the law must not only authorize the act to be done, but must require its performance.” Hart v. Head, 186 Ga. 823, 824 (199 S. E. 125); Murphy v. Withers, 204 Ga. 60 (48 S. E. 2d, 721).

2. In the instant action for mandamus to compel the Clerk of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Richardson v. CokerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Hart v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Wofford Oil Co. v. City of CalhounSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  5. Loftis Plumbing & Heating Co. v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hartsfield v. SalemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API