Richardson v. Awtry Lowndes Company
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Chief Justice.
1. “To entitle one to the writ of mandamus it must appear that he has a clear legal right to have performed the particular act which he seeks to have enforced.” City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort, 153 Ga. 499 (5) (113 S. E. 545); Speed Oil Co. v. Aldredge, 192 Ga. 285 (15 S. E. 2d, 214). “Before mandamus will issue, the law must not only authorize the act to be done, but must require its performance.” Hart v. Head, 186 Ga. 823, 824 (199 S. E. 125); Murphy v. Withers, 204 Ga. 60 (48 S. E. 2d, 721).
2. In the instant action for mandamus to compel the Clerk of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Richardson v. CokerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Hart v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Wofford Oil Co. v. City of CalhounSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Loftis Plumbing & Heating Co. v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hartsfield v. SalemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958