Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Pollard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1899No. 18,644PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Prom the Howard Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

By the order of the Howard Circuit Court, one Forgey, who was the plaintiff in a civil action pending m that court, was admitted to prosecute the same as a poor person, agreeably to the provisions of §260 R. S. 1881 and Horner 1897, §261 Burns 1894. The appellee, an attorney of that court, was assigned him to prosecute the suit. The appointment was accepted, and such professional services as were necessary in the action were performed by appellee. Afterwards, the court by its further order, allowed the appellee the sum of $100 as compensation for his services. A certified copy of this order…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Webb v. BairdIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Tull v. State ex rel. GlessnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Blythe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Board of Commissioners v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Board of Commissioners v. SummerfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Knox County Council v. State Ex Rel. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Sholes v. SholesIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Street v. Varney Electrical Supply Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Board of Commissioners v. MowbrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Turner v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API