Legal Opinion

Sholes v. Sholes

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2001No. 27S02-0112-CV-655PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR TRANSFER

BOEHM, Justice.

We grant transfer in this civil appeal to determine whether Indiana Code section 34-10-1-2 requires appointment of counsel for civil litigants who are without "sufficient means to prosecute or defend an action." We hold: (1) appointment of counsel under the statute is mandatory; (2) counsel appointed under the statute must be compensated; and (8) Indiana Trial Rule 60.5 gives trial courts the power to order payment of appointed counsel, but (4) the same considerations governing other court- mandated funding apply in determining whether mandate is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Bayh v. SonnenburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Knox County Council v. State Ex Rel. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Durham Ex Rel. Estate of Wade v. U-Haul InternationalIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Webb v. BairdIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Naugle v. Beech Grove City SchoolsIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Gersh Zavodnik v. Irene HarperIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Cheatham v. PohleIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Parks v. Madison CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Datzek v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API