Legal Opinion

Uralsky v. Gribbon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 7, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of being struck by defendant’s automobile. It was the contention of the plaintiff that the accident occurred solely as a result of defendant’s negligence. The defendant, on the other hand, insisted that he operated his automobile in a prudent manner, and that the accident was due to the fault of the plaintiff. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of defendant.

After the main charge of the court was finished, the attorney for the defendant made the following request: “ Mr. Bruenner: Yes, I ask…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knapp v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Barker v. . SavageNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Buhrens v. Dry-Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Finnegan v. MayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hogeboom v. ProttsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  2. Jarrett v. MadifariAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Roth v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API