Legal Opinion
Kennedy v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Village of Patchogue
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 2, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On or about November 3, 2004 the respondent Chris Peppard (hereinafter Peppard) was granted a frontage variance by the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of Village of Patchogue (hereinafter the ZBA) in relation to his construction of a single-*547family dwelling. The ZBA directed Peppard to comply with Zoning Code of Village of Patchogue § 93-51 (A), which required the “improvement, construction or alteration” that was the subject of the variance to be “substantially commenced” within one year after the variance was granted. On or about February 15, 2005 Peppard obtained site plan approval for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frishman v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Brancato v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Ferraris v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Falco Realty, Inc. v. Town of Poughkeepsie Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Conti v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by4 opinions
- Green 2009, Inc. v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- 1215 Northern Boulevard, LLC v. Board of Zoning AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Green 2009, Inc. v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Gray v. Village of PatchogueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018