Mason Tire & Rubber Co. v. Cummins-Blair Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The court has reached the following conclusions with reference to the admissibility of evidence presented upon the offers to prove by the plaintiff, the Cummins-Blair Company:
On offers 1 to 6, involving the offer of the plaintiff to show that defendant interrupted plaintiff’s access to the site of the work and interfered with the bringing of materials to the job, by the construction of certain tracks, embankments, and a certain ditch upon the premises, without advising the plaintiff, prior to the execution of the contract, that it was about to do so, Marshall, C. J., Allen,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Bulley & Andrews, Inc. v. Symons Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Morgan v. Town of BurlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Nix, Inc. v. City of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
- John P. Novatny Electric Co. v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Julian Speer Co. v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Court of Claims · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.