Legal Opinion

Lemus v. State of Wyoming

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2007No. 06-68PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

Appellant, Marco Pedro Lemus (Le-mus), challenges his convictions for first degree felony murder (murder committed during the course of a robbery 1 ) and conspiracy to commit aggravated robbery. We will affirm.

ISSUES

Lemus raises these issues:

1. Uncharged evidence was improperly presented to the jury when the State showed the jury a video without redacting evidence of other crimes.

2. The pathologist's testimony was improperly admitted without adequate foundation when he was not the pathologist who performed the autopsy.

3. The prosecutor's remarks in closing argument constituted…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dysthe v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. The United States of America v. Eddie BarboaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  3. Wehr v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Robert Williams v. J. R. Martin, Warden, and the Attorney General of the State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  5. State v. ConwayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wease v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Harris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Harris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Ken v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API