Legal Opinion

O'Neal v. Bronopolsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 2007PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), dated July 5, 2006, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant failed to establish, prima facie, that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Coscia v. 938 Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Hughes v. CaiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Loadholt v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Monkhouse v. Maven Limo, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. McMillian v. NaparanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Coleman v. Shangri-La Taxi, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Martinez v. Yi Zhong ChenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Sajid v. MurzinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API