Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Shangri-La Taxi, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 11, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants failed to meet their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff Virginia Coleman (hereinafter the plaintiff) did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345, 351 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendants failed to even address the plaintiffs allegation that she suffered a left shoulder injury as a result of the subject accident (see Monkhouse v Maven Limo, Inc., 44 AD3d 630, 630-631 [2007]; O’Neal v Bronopolsky, 41 AD3d 452 [2007];…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Coscia v. 938 Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Hughes v. CaiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Loadholt v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lee v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Martinez v. EhrenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Merzguioui-Gray v. Shlomit Express Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008