Legal Opinion

Monster Energy Company v. Beastup LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 3, 2021No. 2:17-cv-01605Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Monster Energy Company, No. 2:17-cv-01605-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. Beastup LLC, 1S Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Monster Energy Company moves in /imine for an order prohibiting defendant 18 | Beastup LLC from offering at trial any evidence or argument that Monster is a “trademark bully” 19 | and from using other similar disparaging labels. See generally Mot., ECF No. 70; Mem., 20 | ECF No. 71. The matter is fully briefed. See generally Opp’n, ECF No. 74; Reply, ECF No. 76. 21 | As discussed at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lahoti v. Vericheck, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Lahoti v. Vericheck, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API