Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 28, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

162 N.J. Super. 333 (1978)

392 A.2d 1222

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

DONALD L. MILLER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted September 18, 1978.

Decided September 28, 1978.

Before Judges PRESSLER and KING.

Mr. Arthur H. Miller, attorney for the appellant.

Mr. Robert J. Lecky, attorney for respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, J.A.D.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by the Middlesex County Court on a trial de novo of a violation of that portion of the Borough of Milltown zoning ordinance prescribing the permitted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of WillingboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Farrell v. Tp. of TeaneckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Berg Agency v. Township of MaplewoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. Pica v. SarnoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  4. State v. J. & J. PAINTING AND J. & J. ROOFINGNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API