Legal Opinion

State v. Barnes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 1988No. 887SC104PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

I

Defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s allowing the jury to consider a charge of burglary based on the acting in concert principle. Defendant contends that the State failed to present evidence showing that defendant was present at the scene of the burglary or that the burglary was pursuant to a common plan.

Evidence presented at trial relevant to this issue is as follows: On 5 January 1987, defendant’s uncle, Plummer Ruffin, agreed to pay defendant and three other men, Eric Blount, Willie Ruffin, and David Howard, $100 each to go to the home of Plum-mer’s former…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  3. State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. BallardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. MarionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API