State v. Barnes
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge.
I
Defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s allowing the jury to consider a charge of burglary based on the acting in concert principle. Defendant contends that the State failed to present evidence showing that defendant was present at the scene of the burglary or that the burglary was pursuant to a common plan.
Evidence presented at trial relevant to this issue is as follows: On 5 January 1987, defendant’s uncle, Plummer Ruffin, agreed to pay defendant and three other men, Eric Blount, Willie Ruffin, and David Howard, $100 each to go to the home of Plum-mer’s former…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. BallardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. MarionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.