Bishop v. State

HARPER, Judge.

This is the third appeal in this case, the opinions on the two former appeals being found reported in 68 Texas Crim. Rep., 557, 151 S. W. Rep., 821, and 65 Texas Crim. Rep., 484, 144 S. W. Rep., 278, and we deem it unnecessary to recite again the evidence, but merely refer to those opinions. In the first opinion the case was reversed on account of an error in the court’s charge on corroboration of an accomplice; on the second appeal the case was reversed on account of the district attorney referring to the former conviction of appellant, and the failure of the court to give a…