Legal Opinion
Nasco Incorporated v. Vision-Wrap, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 2, 1965No. 14928_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASTLE, Circuit Judge.
Nasco Incorporated, plaintiff-appellant, the owner by assignment of Mead and Slagel U. S. Patent No. 2,973,131, brought suit in the District Court charging Vision-Wrap, Inc., defendant-appellee, with infringement. The defendant asserted invalidity of the patent and denied infringement. Following trial of the issues the District Court made and entered findings of fact and conclusions of law, and filed a memorandum of decision. The court found and concluded, in substance, that all claims of the patent are invalid as against prior art disclosures and, additionally, that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Armour & Co. v. Wilson & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Charles Peckat Mfg. Co. v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Aerosol Research Company v. Scovill Manufacturing Company (A. Schrader's Son Division)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Kiwi Coders Corporation and James G. McKay v. Acro Tool & Die Works and Alfred J. Farkas, 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. Kollsman Instrument CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Caterpillar Tractor Co., a California Corporation v. Berco, S.P.A., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Terrell J. Reese and Reese Products, Inc. v. Elkhart Welding and Boiler Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Rich Products Corporation v. Mitchell Foods, Inc., and Frank S. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Koehring Company v. ED Etnyre & CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.