Legal Opinion

Colonial Penn Life Ins. Co. v. Parker

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided January 24, 2019No. Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-01233PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

V

Plaintiffs second contention-that Parker's insurance application contains critical misstatements-also has merit. Below, *384the application is reproduced in pertinent part:

Question 3b and its answer are at issue:

In the past 3 years have you had or been treated for:

b. Cancer... mental or nervous disorder, drug or alcohol abuse ...

As can be seen, Parker answered, "no" by marking the corresponding box. The application continues on to stress that the accuracy of the information provided is important. Directly above Parker's signature it states:

I have read the questions and my answers are true and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fleming Foods of Texas, Inc. v. RylanderTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Crosstex Energy Services, L.P. v. Pro Plus, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Mayes v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Traxler v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Robinson v. Reliable Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American National Insurance Company v. Bertha Arce, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly SituatedTexas Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Bertha Arce, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. American National Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2021
  3. Guzman v. Allstate Assurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023
  4. Paulette McKnight v. Alondra Villareal, and Redpoint County Mutual Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Pruco Life Insurance Company v. VillarealDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API