Legal Opinion

Feibleman v. Edmonds

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1887No. 2356PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Hunt. Tried below before the Hon. J. A. B. Putman.

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.

This was an action by the appellee against all the appellants for actual damages for wrongfully suing out an attachment by E. & T. J. Feibleman against appellee, the other appellants being sureties on the attachment bond, and against E. & T. J. Feibleman alone for maliciously sueing out. the same writ. The case below resulted in a verdict and judgment for appellee against all the appellants for one hundred and fifty dollars actual damages, and against E. & T. J. Feibleman for four thousand eight hundred and fifty dollars vindictive damages. Erom this judgment an appeal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barney v. LathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. I. & G. N. R'y Co. v. BrettTexas Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McClure v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  2. Bolz v. CroneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Boehne v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1935
  4. Carothers v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891
  5. Murphy v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API