Legal Opinion
Messick v. Powell
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided January 26, 1951PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stanley, Commissioner
Reversing.
The suit was initiated by the former owners of a farm in Woodford County, Sam. H. Powell and Kitty Reed Powell, seeking a declaratory judgment as to which of two real estate agents they are liable to for commission upon its sale. The two defendants, D. R. Messick and A. C. Chinn, respectively, responded with an answer and counter-claim against the plaintiffs and a cross petition against each other. Chinn merely prayed that the court declare and adjudge that the plaintiffs *807were indebted to him in the sum of $1,786.50 interest and costs. Messick prayed judgment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stensgaard v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Carter v. Hall & MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Gilmore & Co. v. Samuels & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Moore v. Holman Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Murphy v. Sawyer & WarfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Whiting v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Mellos v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Roger Crane & Associates, Inc. v. FeliceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Vint v. AshlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- SMA Portfolio Owner, LLC v. Corporex Realty & Investment, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.