Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 11, 1910PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Marshall District Court. — Hon. J. M. Parker, Judge. The defendant was convicted of the crime of practicing medicine without a license, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

The indictment charged that the " defendant “did wrongfully and unlawfully • publicly profess to be a physician and assume the duties of a physician, and then and there wrongfully, falsely, and unlawfully did publicly profess to cure and heal diseases, nervous disorders, displacements, injuries, and ailments by means of a certain system and treatment known as Chiropractic” without, etc. The defendant advertised as follows : “Dr. F. M. Miller, Chiropractor, . . . Marshalltown, Iowa, Read carefully the contents of this *523Booklet. It will interest you. The Cure of Disease. - Cure of disease…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Illinois State Board of Dental Examiners v. People ex rel. CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. State v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. State v. HeathSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Iowa Eclectic Medical College Ass'n v. SchraderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. McLeland v. Marshall CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. Trellsite Foundry & Stamping Co. v. Enterprise FoundryMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Locke v. Ionia Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Walkenhorst v. KeslerUtah Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API