Legal Opinion
Collins v. Hertz Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 10, 2006No. B185398PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOLAND, J.
SUMMARY
Two employees sued their employer and numerous individual employees and supervisors for workplace harassment and retaliation, violation of the Family Rights Act, and race, age and disability discrimination in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Government Code section 12940 et seq., and public policy. Defendants moved for summary judgment. In opposition to the motion, plaintiffs submitted voluminous papers which failed to comply with the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure section 437c (section 437c), or California Rules of Court, rule 342…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Myers v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Okorie v. L. A. Unified Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Hodjat v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Chan v. LundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.