Legal Opinion

Brooksby v. Geico General Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 2012No. 38761PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I.Nature of the Case

Christina Brooksby (“Brooksby”) demanded payment from GEICO General Insurance Company (“GEICO”), the liability insurer of her father, Craig Brooksby (“Father”), alleging that Father negligently injured her by crashing the car in which she was riding. After GEICO refused Brooksby’s demand pursuant to an exclusion in its insurance policy with Father, Brooksby sued GEICO for a declaratory judgment establishing coverage. The district court dismissed Brooks-by’s Complaint for lack of standing, holding that (1) Idaho has no common-law direct-action rule that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Losser v. BradstreetIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Taylor v. McNicholsIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Pocatello Industrial Park Co. v. Steel West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. RhoadesIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tracy Tucker v. State of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Westover v. Idaho Counties Risk Mgmt. ProgramIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. ABC Agra, LLC v. Critical Access Group, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Sommer v. Misty Valley, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  5. ABC Agra v. Critical Access GroupIdaho Supreme Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API