Legal Opinion

Seidlitz v. Eames

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1987No. 85CA0979PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STERNBERG, Judge.

Patricia Ann Seidlitz, the widow of Ernest D. Seidlitz (Seidlitz), filed an action seeking a declaratory judgment that she was entitled to the proceeds of two insurance policies on the life of her deceased husband. The court instead awarded the proceeds to Sandra K. Becker Eames, and Kenneth R. Becker (the Becker children) as contingent beneficiaries and successor-owners. Their mother, Katherine M. Becker (Katherine), had killed Seidlitz. Plaintiff appeals, and we affirm.

Before Seidlitz’ death, Katherine had been involved in a fourteen and one-half year romantic relationship…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. GreenburgSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  2. Walton v. WaltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. Strickland v. WysowatckySupreme Court of Colorado · 1952

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lunsford v. Western States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Spencer v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Diep v. RivasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Lundsford v. Western States Life InsuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. AthmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API