Legal Opinion · Dissent

Union Oil Associates v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1935No. L. A. 14286Published

1Dissent

THOMPSON, J., Dissenting.

I cannot bring myself to concur in the prepared opinion.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover from the defendant the franchise tax paid by the plaintiff in the year 1931, based upon its income for the year 1930. The demurrer of the defendant being overruled, and he declin*738ing to answer, his default was entered and judgment followed. This appeal is from the judgment.

By the complaint it is made to appear that the respondent was organized for the purpose of consolidating and maintaining in one holding or pool shares of the capital stock of the Union Oil…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Michigan Trust Co. v. BronsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. The Pacific Co., Ltd. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. People v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API