Legal Opinion

Boucher v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 27, 1986No. 93, Docket 86-6085PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The law firm of Yellen & Herstic represented Marcy E. Boucher in a personal injury action against the United States and American Airlines. The case was dismissed, and the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kram, J.) imposed sanctions, specifically $1,788.52 in attorney’s fees, to be shared jointly between Boucher and the law firm. The law firm appeals, arguing not that the sanctions were unjustified, but that the repeated delays in the district court were the fault of the client; it urges us to hold that Boucher alone should pay the fees.1 Because we find the record before…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Mcfarland v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schoenberg v. Shapolsky PublishersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. In Re Yellen & Herstic. Marcy E. Boucher v. United States of America, and Yellen & Herstic, United States of America, Third-Party v. American Airlines, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API