Legal Opinion
Schoenberg v. Shapolsky Publishers
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 10, 1991No. 91 Civ. 0208 (DNE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
After defendants failed to comply with this Court’s order compelling discovery, plaintiff brought an order to show cause why this Court should not hold defendants and their attorney, Samuel A. Abady, in contempt and impose sanctions on them. For the reasons stated below, this Court finds that Mr. Abady is in contempt of this Court’s order and that sanctions are appropriate. In addition, this Court will hold a further hearing to determine whether defendants are at all responsible for plaintiff’s inability to obtain discovery. If this Court finds that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Susan Mary Kamen v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Patricia McDonald and Carol BuckhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Local 28 of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harris O. Schoenberg v. Shapolsky Publishers, Incorporated, Ian Shapolsky and Steimatzky Publishing of North America, Inc., Samuel A. Abady, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. AhmedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Schoenberg v. Shapolsky Publishers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996