Legal Opinion
In re One Hundred & Sixtieth St.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from special term.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.
Proceedings having been duly instituted by the mayor,, etc., to acquire title to the land lying in One Hundred and Sixtieth street between the Eleventh avenue and Kingsbridge road, the commissioners, who were duly appointed, filed an abstract of their estimate and assessment, and duly advertised for objections to the same. As appears by this abstract, only a nominal award was made for the land, and no award was made for the buildings situate on' the land on One Hundred and Sixtieth street between the Tenth avenue and the Kingsbridge road. Objections were duly made and filed by William P.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Common Council Ex Rel. Opening of North Thirteenth StreetNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Indianapolis v. Board of Church Extension of the United Presbyterian ChurchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- In re Opening Ninety-Fourth StreetNew York Supreme Court · 1897
- In re Department of Public WorksNew York Supreme Court · 1892
- In re Opening of One Hundred & Sixtieth StreetNew York Supreme Court · 1891