Legal Opinion

In re Opening Ninety-Fourth Street

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Pbooeedings to condemn land for street opening purposes.

1Opinion of the CourtBeekman, J.

The commissioners have awarded to the owners of the' fee of the land included within the lines of Ninety-fourth street, between First avenue and high-water mark, the full value of the property. Objections have been filed to the report by the *33city and other parties affected by the assessment which has been laid to meet the awards, and the questions thus raised have been,1 discussed on this motion, which is made to confirm the report.,

It is claimed by the objectors that only nominal awards should have been made on the ground that there has been an actual dedication of the land lying in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bissell v. . the New York Central R.R. CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. In the Matter of Opening Eleventh AvenueNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. City of Buffalo v. . PrattNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. In Re Vil. of Olean v. . SteynerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Matter of AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re MayorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  3. In re Lawrence StreetNew York Supreme Court · 1912
  4. In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API