Legal Opinion

Makara v. Brown

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1996No. 20452PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff filed a Petition seeking a determination of heirship, under Section 474.060, RSMol994. Plaintiff claimed that she was decedent’s only child. Pursuant to Defendants’ motion to dismiss, the trial court determined that Section 474.060 “was preempted in 1987 by the legislature’s adoption of the Uniform Parentage Act, i.e. Chapter 210 RSMo_” Plaintiffs Petition was thereafter dismissed.1

The basis of the trial court’s ruling was that Section 474.060 was preempted and apparently repealed by implication by the Uniform Parentage Act, §§ 210.817-210.852, RSMol994.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of NocitaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Metropolitan Tickets, Inc. v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Inman v. Reorganized School District No. II of HaytiMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Matt v. Burrell, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Coffelt v. HuntMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Philips v. Citimortgage, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Industrial Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. Thermal Science, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Estate of Brady v. RossottiMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API