Legal Opinion

Brenner v. Wright

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 25, 1936No. 11467PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

“The first grant of a new trial, though predicated exclusively on special legal grounds, will not be disturbed by this court, unless it affirmatively appears that the verdict complained of was absolutely demanded.” Harvey v. Bowles, 112 Ga. 363 (37 S. E. 363); Rowe Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs County, 152 Ga. 548 (110 S. E. 303), and cit.; Medders v. Blackshear Manufacturing Co., 180 Ga. 550 (179 S. E. 628); Blitch v. Wells, 180 Ga. 566 (179 S. E. 629). In this case the law and facts did not demand the verdict. The motion for new trial was based on general and special…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rowe Bros. Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Harvey v. BowlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Blitch v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  4. Medders v. Blackshear Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baker v. McGarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Brenner v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Brenner v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Jones v. J. S. H. CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API