Legal Opinion

Friedberger v. Stulpnagel

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1908PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, first district, borough of Manhattan.

1Per curiam

In the original summons, issued in this action, the words and figures “ 128 Prince Street,” which were intended to designate the location of the court-house in the first district, Municipal Court, were stricken out and the words “66 Lafayette Street ” written over them in ink. The copy of the summons which was served upon the defendant also had the words “ 128 Prince Street ” stricken out, without any designation or mention of the street, or mention of the court-house. The defendant failed to appear upon the return day and a judgment was taken against her *499as by default. The next day, an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. WechlerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
  2. Carpenter v. WillettNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. Noble v. CrandallNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Edel v. McConeNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
  5. People v. CampbellNew York Supreme Court · 1864

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Goldenberg v. AdlerNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Review & Record Co. v. GilbrethAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
  3. Roberts & Lewis Co. v. DaleAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
  4. Bank of Long Island v. GregoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  5. Bloch v. WeinsteinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API