Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Wechler

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 5, 1892PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from fifth district court. Action by plaintiff, Bernard Schwartz, and his assignor, for services renden d as teacher in an unincorporated association of which defendants were members and directors. From judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

This action was brought against Morris Wechler, Joseph Eichner, Ignatz Bleich, and M and el Friedman for services render-d by the plaintiff and his assignor as teachers in the school known as the “Oestreicher Hungarisclia Talmud Torah,” at No. 102 Cannon street, in this city; it being claimed by the plaintiff that the school was conducted by a voluntary association bearing said name, and of which the defendants were directors and members. The defendants denied that they individually and for themselves engaged the plaintiff and his assignor, but claimed "that they were originally employed by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hard v. ShipmanNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Kingsland v. BraistedNew York Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Hudson v. SpauldingNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Wooster v. ChamberlinNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Darrah v. BoysNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lynes v. HickeyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  2. Friedberger v. StulpnagelAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
  3. Loeb v. SmithAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
  4. Hanlon v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  5. Patterson Gas Governor Co. v. Lichtenstein Bros.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API