Legal Opinion
Electrical Fittings Corp. v. Thomas & Betts Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 10, 1943No. Civ. No. 903PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
This is a civil action for treble damages under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S. C.A. § 15. The complaint, following a common pattern, alleges that the defendants, in violation of Section 3 of the said Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 14, and Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 and 2, and pursuant to and in furtherance of an unlawful conspiracy “to restrain trade, to establish and maintain a monopoly in the manufacture and sale of electrical fittings, to lessen competition in the manufacture, sale, jobbing and distribution of electrical fittings, and to fix…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Masonite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Ethyl Gasoline Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ohio Citizens Trust Co. v. Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1944
- Stuart Inv. Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1951
- Hartmann v. American News Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Andrews v. HeinzmanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1949
- Ragsdale v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955