Legal Opinion

Heather Walden v. Alliance for Multispeciality Research, LLC

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided February 13, 2026No. 3:24-cv-00232Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE HEATHER WALDEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 3:24-CV-232-TAV-JEM ) ALLIANCE FOR MULTISPECIALITY ) RESEARCH, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This case is before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Rules of this Court, and Standing Order 13-02. Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Supplement Amended Complaint [Doc. 76]. Defendant responded in opposition to the motion [Doc. 82]. Plaintiff did not file a reply. The motion is ripe for adjudication. See E.D. Tenn. L.R. 7.1(a). For the reasons…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. Chiles Power Supply, Inc., D/B/A Heatway Systems, Robert S. JulianCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Gary Vander Boegh v. EnergySolutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. Jones-McNamara v. Holzer Health SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  4. AK v. Behavioral Health Sys., Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
  5. U.S. ex rel. David Felten v. William Beaumont Hosp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API