Legal Opinion

Town of Glasgow v. Mathews

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 20, 1906PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a decree in chancery of the Circuit Court of Rockbridge county. Decree for complainants. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

The appellees are the owners of a considerable boundary of land within the corporate limits of the town of Glasgow, lying in the fork of James and Forth rivers, and extending from the river banks to a course represented by a red line on a map of the town prepared by the Rockbridge company and exhibited with appellees’ bill. It is matter of local history that Glasgow was a product of the “boom” of 1890, and that it was the dream of its projectors, the development company, to erect a city at the junction of those streams. It was with that purpose in view that the company was organized, and,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scott v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  2. Oney v. West Buena Vista Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Adams v. RowlesTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Griffith v. AllisonTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. United Finance Corp. v. Royal Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  4. Payne v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1926
  5. Town of Basic City v. BellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API