Legal Opinion

Boyce v. McMahan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1974No. 7418SC351PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the paper writing which is the subject of this action is merely an agreement to agree, and therefore unenforceable as a contract. We think there is merit to this position.

“An offer to enter into a contract in the future must, to be binding, specify all the essential and material terms and leave nothing to be agreed upon as a result of future negotiations. (Citations omitted.)” Young v. Sweet, 266 N.C. 623, 625, 146 S.E. 2d 669 (1966).

“ ‘Unless an agreement to make a future contract is definite and certain upon the subjects to be embraced therein it is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Young v. SweetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. TSC RESEARCH, LLC v. Bayer Chemicals Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
  2. Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated.North Carolina Business Court · 2003
  3. Triad Packaging, Inc. v. SupplyOne, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2013
  4. Jdh Capital, LLC v. FlowersNorth Carolina Business Court · 2009
  5. Smith v. House of Kenton CorporationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API