Legal Opinion

Smith v. House of Kenton Corporation

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1974No. 7426SC652PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

The theory of plaintiff’s action is that the defendant breached a contract to execute a lease. That the judgment was predicated on that theory is indicated by the following conclusion of law:

“3. That the written offer of the plaintiff dated July 15, 1970, when accepted by the defendant corporation on July 16, 1970, became a contract to execute a lease and as such is enforceable to the same extent as if the parties had entered into a written lease agreement containing the terms of the said contract to execute a lease.”

The question then arises, was the letter dated 15 July 1970…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Croom v. Goldsboro Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Yeager v. DobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Dodds v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Wade v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zinn v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Gregory v. Perdue, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated.North Carolina Business Court · 2003
  4. Martinez v. CalataSuperior Court of Guam · 2013
  5. Ratner v. MRC PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API