Legal Opinion
Smith v. House of Kenton Corporation
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided November 6, 1974No. 7426SC652PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
The theory of plaintiff’s action is that the defendant breached a contract to execute a lease. That the judgment was predicated on that theory is indicated by the following conclusion of law:
“3. That the written offer of the plaintiff dated July 15, 1970, when accepted by the defendant corporation on July 16, 1970, became a contract to execute a lease and as such is enforceable to the same extent as if the parties had entered into a written lease agreement containing the terms of the said contract to execute a lease.”
The question then arises, was the letter dated 15 July 1970…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Croom v. Goldsboro Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Yeager v. DobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Dodds v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Wade v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zinn v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Gregory v. Perdue, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated.North Carolina Business Court · 2003
- Martinez v. CalataSuperior Court of Guam · 2013
- Ratner v. MRC PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998