Gersdorf-Sloan Ambulance ServIce, Inc. v. Kenty
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Justice.
WMle crogsing a busilless street in San An-toni0; appellee collWed witIl an amb)4anee owned and operated by appellant, and recovered judgment against the latter for personal injuries sustained in the collision.
The jury found, upon conclusive evidence, that appellee was guilty of contributory negligence directly causing or contributing to his injury, but further found, upon conflicting evidence, against appellant upon the theory of discovered peril. This is the second appeal in the case. Gersdorf, etc., v. Kenty (Tex. Civ. App.) 46 S.W.(2d) 469.
The case is fully stated in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gersdorf-Sloan Ambulance Service, Inc. v. KentyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
3Cited by11 opinions
- Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Aranda v. Texas & N. O. R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Surkey v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Cantu v. South Texas Transp. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Phoenix Refining Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.