Legal Opinion
Phoenix Refining Co. v. Morgan
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 27, 1944No. 11592PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice.
Appellant’s statement, admittedly correct, is adopted:
“This is a suit for damages brought by appellees, Mrs. Lucille Morgan, a widow, suing individually and as the administra-trix of the estate of her deceased husband, Neal Morg-an, and also as the mother and next friend of her minor son, Gene Ray Morgan, for the death of said Neal Morgan growing out of an automobile collision between a truck owned by Neal Morgan, deceased, and driven by his son, Gene Ray Morgan, and a truck owned by appellant, Phoenix Refining Company; said accident occurring on March 20, 1942, on Highway No.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ramirez v. AckerTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Robbins v. WynneTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- McFaddin v. HebertTexas Supreme Court · 1929
- Smerke v. Office Equipment CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Turner v. Texas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Flanigan v. CarswellTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Younger Bros., Inc. v. MarinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Origen C. Hall v. National Supply Company and C. J. Overby and W. H. Bland, D/B/A Service Drilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- American General Insurance Company v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Parr v. ParrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.