Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wyman-Gordon Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 12, 1968No. 7000_1Published

1DissentCoffin, Circuit Judge

For the purpose of deciding the applicability of the notice provision of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S. C.A. § 1003(a), I view the Excelsior rule as procedural and thus valid despite absence of advance notice. I recognize that this is a ground not relied on by the Board, which seemed to assert a standard defense to a standard assault. But the same shoe fits both parties, for the distinction which divides this court was obviously far from the concern of appellant, which said in its brief, “ * * * it is clear the Board recognized that it was establishing a new rule or procedure in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Hanes Hosiery Division-- Hanes CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Karl Rohlen, as President of Crane Packing Company, and Crane Packing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  5. Walling v. Brooklyn Braid Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API