Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Kraft

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the district court for Hall county. Tried below before Harrison, J. cited: People v. Gosper, 3 Neb., 3.10; Hamilton v. Thrall, 7 Id., 219; Seh. Hist. v. Estes, 13 Id., 53; Harbaohv. Miller, 14 Id., 13; Jones v. Witherspoon, 78 Am. Dec. [N. Car.], 260; Smith v. Jordan, 13 Minn., 264.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This is an action by Rufus H. Jordan against John Kraft upon a party wall agreement to recover one-half of the cost of a portion of a party wall erected by the plaintiff on the division lines of their lots. There was judgment in the court below for the defendant.

On the 20th day of May, 1881, the plaintiff was the owner of the west one-third of lot 2, in block 65, of the city of Grand Island, and the defendant owned the center one-third part of said lot. On that day the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement for the erection of a party wall on the line dividing their real…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Loyal Mystic Legion v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Scottish-American Mortg. Co. v. RussellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API