Seipel v. Olympic Coast Investments
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray
¶1 Joe Seipel appeals from an order and judgment of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his action for malicious prosecution and abuse of process. We reverse and remand.
¶2 We restate the issues as whether the District Court erred in granting summary judgment on Seipel’s claim for malicious prosecution and whether the court erred in granting summary judgment on Seipel’s claim for abuse of process.
BACKGROUND
¶3 This action arises out of a federal court action Olympic Coast Investments (Olympic), a Washington…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sacco v. High Country Independent Press, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
- Seltzer v. MortonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- First Bank (N.A.) — Billings v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1989
- Brault v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Plouffe v. Montana Department of Public Health & Human ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McCollough v. Johnson, Rodenburg & Lauinger, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Berkshire Investments, LLC v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Diana's v. Crazy MountainMontana Supreme Court · 2020
- McCollough v. Johnson, Rodenberg & LauingerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2009
- Helvik v. TuscanoMontana Supreme Court · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.