Legal Opinion

Brickley v. Finley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 11, 1940No. 3910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Chief Justice.

This is a suit by the appellant Brickley against the appellees O. Z. Finley and C. O. Finley to recover upon a promissory note executed by the defendants, dated December 21, 1932, payable six months after date. The petition first declares upon the note in the usual manner, and then alleges :

*434“5. Plaintiff further alleges that said defendant O. Z. Finley did on the 11th day of April, 193S, in writing extend and promise to pay said note, and that said defendant has from time to time, in writing, promised to pay said note.
“6. That the defendant, C. O. Finley, did in writing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. FlyTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Howard Hume, Administrators, Etc. v. WindomTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Cain v. BonnerTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Salinas v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  5. President of the Bank of Alabama v. SimontonTexas Supreme Court · 1847

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Putoma Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  2. Burlington-Rock Island Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. Hopper v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. California Chemical Company v. SasserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Dearing v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API