Legal Opinion

Miami-Dade County v. Barilari

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 13, 2001No. 3D00-2337Published

1Per curiam

Affirmed. See Vann v. American Motorists Ins. Co., 627 So.2d 601, 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (stating that “none of the comments made by defense counsel were so prejudicial or inflammatory as to require mistrial, or a new trial, especially where the witness never answered the question and no evidence on the issue was ever *673presented to the jury”); see also Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Gutierrez, 731 So.2d 151, 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (“find[ing] that the trial court properly sustained the objections when necessary and properly gave curative instructions when necessary that obviated the harm,” and thus…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vann v. American Motorists Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. GutierrezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API